Document positioning review · predictive due diligence

Turn company reports into due-diligence workplans.

Upload a document. Extract the claims. Test what matters.

Used in investment committee preparation and deal review.

Company documents describe a position. They do not test it. Document Positioning Review reads reports, investor decks and disclosures as an analyst would: extracting the material claims, identifying risk language and showing what needs to be tested against the outside world.

The result is not a summary, but a structured due-diligence workplan that can be revisited when a half-year, monthly update or new release arrives.

Claims Disclosures Workplan Challenge External signal Audit-ready
Part of the PE workflowwhere DD lives
01Deal screening
02Due diligence
03Portfolio monitoring
04Investment committee
05Exit timing
Core positioning

Not summary. Challenge.

Most tools summarise documents. Noah does something different:

  • Identifies what is being claimed
  • Ranks what matters
  • Separates real disclosure from boilerplate
  • Builds a structured plan for what to test next
What it does

Seven analyst-grade jobs Noah is built for.

Investors, lenders and diligence teams use Document Positioning Review to read a document the way an analyst would — claims first, challenge second.

What you can do.

  • Upload company reports, investor decks or disclosures
  • Extract and rank material claims
  • Identify key risk and disclosure language
  • Detect missing or underweighted risks
  • Build a due-diligence workplan
  • Challenge selected claims against external signal
  • Export structured reports and data packs

Example questions.

  • Is this strategy credible?
  • What are they actually claiming?
  • What matters here?
  • What is missing?
  • What should we test next?
  • Which claims are weak?
  • Does the outside world support this?
What you actually receive

A structured positioning read, with the workplan attached.

Every Document Positioning Review returns a positioning verdict, a composite, an extracted claim map, a risk-and-disclosure map, and a workplan of what to test next — paired with a structured bundle so the review is interrogable end-to-end.

Example output

Mid-cap industrial · Investor presentation

Positioning read Partially supported, requires challenge
Composite 57 / 100
Confidence Moderate
18 Claims identified
6 High priority
12 Risk disclosures 4 specific · 8 generic
Claim map · top examples
  • Expansion into new markets Requires validation
  • Supply chain resilience Mixed support
  • Margin improvement Weak external confirmation
Risk & disclosure map
  • Regulatory exposure Understated
  • Supplier concentration Partially disclosed
  • Market demand assumptions Not clearly evidenced
Workplan · next steps
  • Public-signal validation of expansion claims
  • Regulatory and licensing review
  • Supplier dependency check
  • Competitor positioning comparison
document-review.json · click to expand
{
  "frame": "document_positioning_review",
  "subject": "mid-cap industrial investor presentation",
  "positioning": "partially_supported",
  "composite": 57,
  "claims": 18,
  "priority_claims": 6,
  "risk_disclosures": {
    "specific": 4,
    "generic":  8
  },
  "workplan_items": 4
}
Click for the full bundle — structured, machine-readable, audit-ready
Inside the review

Six analytical capabilities, working together.

Document Positioning Review is not one feature. It's a stack of analyst-grade capabilities that read, classify, challenge and plan in sequence.

Feature 01

Document Positioning Review.

Upload a company report, investor deck or disclosure. Noah extracts claims, identifies risk language and builds a structured review.

Feature 02

Claim Map.

Material claims are extracted and ranked across the dimensions that actually move a diligence call.

Growth Strategy Market position Governance Financial resilience Regulatory exposure
Feature 03

Risk & Disclosure Map.

Noah separates specific, actionable disclosures from generic boilerplate, then highlights what's missing and what's underweighted.

  • Missing risks
  • Underweighted exposures
  • Weak disclosure areas
Feature 04

Claim-vs-World Challenge.

Selected claims are tested against public signal. Outputs are explicit:

Supported Mixed Challenged Untested No material signal
Feature 05

Due-Diligence Workplan.

The system converts the document into the next steps an analyst would actually take.

  • Signal validation
  • Regulatory checks
  • Filings and registry review
  • Litigation search
  • Sanctions / PEP screening (where configured)
  • Competitor comparison
  • Private document review
Important

Premium checks not run.

Noah does not assume verification. Where deeper checks are required they are clearly identified — never implied, never fabricated. The system shows what has been tested and what has not.

How a review is built

Each document is a defined investigation.

Same fixed route. Different document. The output keeps the same shape so a workplan from one diligence is comparable to the next.

How a review comes together.

  • 01Extract document structure and context
  • 02Identify company and subject where possible
  • 03Pull and rank material claims
  • 04Classify disclosure language (specific vs generic)
  • 05Build challenge lanes for high-priority claims
  • 06Generate a structured workplan
  • 07Optionally test claims against external signal
  • 08Compare follow-on reports against the original thesis
  • 09Segment very large reports into priority diligence passes
A new category

The entry point into Predictive Due Diligence.

The document Defines the narrative.
Noah Defines what needs to be tested.
What gets tested
  • Market reality
  • Regulatory exposure
  • Litigation risk
  • Sanctions exposure
  • Financial resilience
  • Competitive pressure
  • Supply-chain exposure
Important boundaries

What's been tested. What hasn't. Always labelled.

Every claim, every check, every output is explicit about its evidence basis. Verification is never assumed.

  • Noah distinguishes public-signal analysis from verified registry, filings, sanctions and litigation checks.
  • Premium checks are clearly labelled when not run.
  • The system does not invent source evidence.
  • Missing checks are turned into a workplan, not hidden.
  • Low-profile public coverage triggers proxy, peer, regime and counter-case lanes rather than being treated as analyst failure.
  • Large documents can be handled as staged reviews: broad sweep first, then deeper segment passes.
Where this is going

Designed to expand into the full diligence stack.

The platform is built to extend into deeper checks as connectors and configurations are turned on.

Prior-year comparison
Competitor document comparison
Financial table extraction
Sanctions / PEP screening (configured)
Corporate registry checks
Litigation and regulatory history
Private data-room review
Full investment committee reports
Who this is for

Built for the desks that read, test and decide.

Investors Private equity teams Underwriters Lenders Due-diligence teams Legal & regulatory teams Strategy teams
Plans

Three depths. Same shape of output.

Every plan returns the same structured review object. The difference is how deep the claim and challenge layers go.

Free / Beta

Try it on a single document.

  • Limited document preview
  • Capped claim extraction
  • Small challenge sample
Pro Analyst

Production document review.

  • Full Document Positioning Review
  • Saved reports
  • Structured data packs
  • Expanded claim extraction
Analyst Plus

Full diligence workflow.

  • Deeper document analysis
  • Larger claim maps
  • Expanded claim challenge
  • Due-diligence workflows
  • API access
  • Premium connectors (when configured)

The document tells you what management says. Noah shows you what to test.

Review a company document.

noah-predict-package · sample evidence bundle
Loading bundle…